Hepatology

NAFLD Fibrosis Score

Advanced fibrosis risk in fatty liver disease.

Education and reference only. Not a substitute for clinical judgement, local policy or product labelling. Always verify before clinical use. Values are calculated in your browser and never stored.

When to use

Use in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to estimate the likelihood of advanced (F3–F4) fibrosis.

Why use

It helps decide who needs specialist assessment or further fibrosis testing.

Background

The NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) estimates the likelihood of advanced (F3–F4) liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using six routinely available variables: age, body-mass index, the presence of impaired fasting glucose or diabetes, the AST/ALT ratio, platelet count and albumin. These are combined in a weighted regression equation to produce a single value. It was developed to help identify, without biopsy, which patients with fatty liver are likely to have advanced fibrosis and therefore need specialist assessment. It is one of the most widely used non-invasive fibrosis scores in this population.

Interpreting the result

The score is read against two cut-offs: a value below −1.455 indicates F0–F2, making advanced fibrosis unlikely; a value above 0.675 indicates F3–F4, making advanced fibrosis likely; and values between the two are indeterminate. The two-threshold design deliberately creates a low-risk and a high-risk zone with high predictive value, at the cost of a sizeable indeterminate middle group. Patients in the high-risk band warrant specialist referral and further fibrosis testing, while those in the indeterminate zone typically need additional assessment such as elastography or FIB-4.

Worked example

A 60-year-old with diabetes, a BMI of 32, AST 50 U/L, ALT 40 U/L, platelets 140 ×10⁹/L and albumin of 3.8 g/dL has a NAFLD fibrosis score above 0.675, placing them in the F3–F4 band where advanced fibrosis is likely and specialist assessment is warranted.

Critical actions

Albumin in g/dL (divide g/L by 10). Cut-offs: <−1.455 and >0.675. The indeterminate zone is common; pair with elastography or FIB-4.

Pearls / pitfalls

  • Enter albumin in g/dL (divide a g/L value by 10) to match the equation.
  • The indeterminate zone is large, so a substantial proportion of patients need a second test such as elastography or FIB-4 rather than a definitive answer from the NFS alone.
  • Its accuracy can fall at the extremes of age and in patients with diabetes, where thresholds may need cautious interpretation.
  • It is specific to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and should not be applied to other chronic liver diseases.

Evidence & validation

Derived and validated by Angulo and colleagues across NAFLD cohorts, the NFS is endorsed in fatty liver disease guidance (for example from EASL and NICE) as a first-line non-invasive tool to stratify the risk of advanced fibrosis and target further testing.

Frequently asked questions

What does the NAFLD fibrosis score predict?

It estimates the likelihood of advanced (F3–F4) fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using age, BMI, glucose status, the AST/ALT ratio, platelets and albumin, helping decide who needs specialist assessment.

What are the cut-off values?

A score below −1.455 indicates advanced fibrosis is unlikely (F0–F2) and a score above 0.675 indicates it is likely (F3–F4). Values between the two are indeterminate and usually require further testing.

Why is there a large indeterminate zone?

The two-threshold design prioritises confident rule-in and rule-out, which leaves a wide middle band. Patients in this zone typically need a second non-invasive test such as elastography or FIB-4.

What should happen if the score is high?

A high score (above 0.675) places the patient in the F3–F4 band, so specialist referral and further fibrosis assessment are warranted to confirm staging and guide management.

Can it be used in other liver diseases?

No. It was derived and validated specifically in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and should not be applied to other chronic liver conditions, where its accuracy is not established.

References

  1. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45(4):846–854.
  2. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol. 2021.

Related calculators

Need a calculator we don't have — or a custom tool?

We build evidence-led clinical calculators, dashboards and reference tools for teams.

☎ Call Get a Proposal